Data Sør

Reducing Output Tokens in Large Language Model Inference Through Smarter Prompting

—

av

Data Sør
i

1. Introduction: The Economic Significance of LLM Output Tokens

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into a growing number of applications has unlocked unprecedented capabilities in natural language processing and generation 1. However, this increased utility comes with significant operational costs, particularly those associated with the inference phase, where LLMs generate responses to user queries 2. A substantial portion of these costs is directly attributable to the number of output tokens produced by the model 3. The expense of incorporating LLMs can range from nominal amounts for occasional use to tens of thousands of dollars per month for sustained deployments 3. For each interaction, billing models typically consider both the input provided to the LLM and the output it generates 4. As applications scale and handle a higher volume of requests, these token-based charges can accumulate rapidly, making the efficient management of output token usage an economic imperative for developers and organizations 2. Even with the observed trend of decreasing inference costs over time, primarily due to advancements in hardware and model optimization, the fundamental pricing structure based on token consumption remains a key factor in overall expenditure 5. Therefore, strategies that effectively reduce the number of output tokens without compromising the quality of the LLM’s responses are highly valuable for ensuring the financial sustainability and scalability of LLM-powered applications. The ability to achieve such efficiency can provide a notable competitive advantage by lowering operational costs and potentially improving response times 6.

2. Understanding the Cost Drivers of LLM Inference Output Tokens

Several factors contribute to the number of output tokens generated during LLM inference, directly influencing the associated costs. One significant driver is the complexity and nature of the user’s input 3. More intricate questions or requests that demand detailed explanations or comprehensive answers will naturally lead the LLM to generate longer responses, resulting in a higher number of output tokens 3. For instance, a prompt asking for a detailed analysis will likely yield a more verbose output than a simple request for a fact. The inherent characteristics of the LLM being used also play a crucial role 7. Different models are trained on diverse datasets and may have varying architectural nuances that affect their verbosity and tokenization practices 8. Some models might be predisposed to generating more descriptive or elaborate responses even for similar queries, leading to higher output token counts compared to other models 9. Furthermore, the specific configuration parameters employed during the inference process can significantly impact the output token count 10. Parameters such as max_tokens, which sets a limit on the maximum length of the generated response, directly control the number of output tokens 10. Similarly, the temperature setting, while primarily influencing the randomness and creativity of the output, can also indirectly affect the length and detail of the generated text 10. Understanding these cost drivers is essential for developing targeted strategies to minimize output token usage. By carefully considering the complexity of the input, the choice of LLM, and the appropriate inference parameters, developers can begin to optimize their applications for cost efficiency 7.

3. Exploring Prompt Engineering Techniques for Output Token Reduction

Prompt engineering offers a powerful set of methodologies to potentially minimize the number of output tokens generated by LLMs. A fundamental technique involves crafting prompts that are clear, concise, and specific in their instructions 14. Ambiguous or overly verbose prompts can lead to longer, less focused responses 16. By providing direct and unambiguous instructions, users can guide the LLM to understand the exact requirements, reducing the likelihood of it generating unnecessary or tangential information 14. For example, instead of asking for a «detailed analysis,» a more concise prompt like «Analyze the company’s financial performance» can often elicit a sufficiently informative yet shorter response 14. Another effective strategy is to explicitly specify the desired output format and length 15. Requesting the output in a structured format such as bullet points, a numbered list, or JSON can lead to more information-dense and thus shorter responses compared to free-form text 17. Additionally, setting explicit length constraints within the prompt, such as «Summarize in under 50 words» or «Answer in one sentence,» provides a clear target for the LLM to adhere to 10. Leveraging context and examples efficiently is also crucial 6. Providing a few carefully chosen examples (few-shot prompting) can demonstrate the desired length and style of the response more effectively than lengthy textual instructions 6. Furthermore, utilizing prompt templates for common tasks can ensure consistency and encapsulate best practices for token optimization 6. Advanced techniques like prompt compression aim to reduce the token count of the input prompt itself, which can indirectly influence the output length by focusing the model on the most essential information 21. Finally, the process of iteratively refining prompts based on empirical results and performance metrics is essential for continuously optimizing token usage and answer quality 6.

4. Analyzing the Impact of Token Reduction on LLM Answer Quality

While reducing output tokens can lead to significant cost savings, it is crucial to analyze the potential impact of these reduction techniques on the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the LLM’s answers 21. The relationship between prompt conciseness and answer quality is not always linear; there exists a point of equilibrium where further reduction might compromise the essential information conveyed 22. Overly brief prompts or aggressive compression can lead to a loss of crucial context, resulting in inaccurate, incomplete, or less nuanced responses 21. For instance, removing too many details from a prompt might prevent the LLM from fully understanding the user’s intent, leading to a superficial or incorrect answer 24. Research has indicated that simply setting an arbitrary low token budget in the prompt might not always be effective and could even backfire, leading to longer outputs and potentially lower quality, a phenomenon referred to as «Token Elasticity» 22. This suggests that LLMs require a certain «space» to reason effectively, and overly restrictive budgets can hinder this process. The impact of prompt conciseness on answer quality can also be task-dependent 22. For some tasks, very direct prompts might suffice, while others requiring complex reasoning or detailed information might necessitate longer, more contextualized prompts 25. Therefore, achieving effective output token reduction requires a nuanced understanding of the task, the capabilities of the LLM, and the careful application of prompt engineering techniques to avoid compromising answer quality 28. Finding the optimal balance often involves experimentation and evaluation to determine the point at which further token reduction begins to negatively affect the desired outcome 29.

5. Specific Prompting Strategies for Generating Concise and Effective Responses

Several specific prompting strategies can be employed to guide LLMs towards generating concise yet effective responses. One fundamental approach is to provide explicit instructions for brevity within the prompt itself 10. Phrases like «Answer in one sentence,» «Summarize in under 50 words,» or «Be brief» directly communicate the need for a concise output 16. Combining these explicit instructions with other effective prompting techniques, such as clarity and specificity, often yields the best results 16. Utilizing structured output formats is another powerful strategy 16. Requesting the response as a bulleted list, a JSON object, or a table can encourage the LLM to present information in a more organized and less verbose manner compared to lengthy paragraphs of free-form text 16. Providing concise context is also crucial 16. While it’s important to give the LLM enough information to understand the query, avoiding unnecessary background details can help prevent it from generating overly elaborate responses 16. When asking open-ended questions, it can be beneficial to include a constraint on the length of the answer 16. For example, «What are the potential impacts of advanced AI in the next decade? Answer in one sentence.» Using few-shot learning with carefully selected examples that demonstrate the desired level of conciseness can also be highly effective 6. These examples implicitly guide the LLM towards producing outputs with a similar length and style. Furthermore, employing prompt templates that are designed for brevity can ensure consistent token optimization across multiple interactions 6. Finally, leveraging techniques like contextual retrieval to provide only the most relevant information to the LLM can help it focus its response and avoid generating extraneous details 6. Iterative refinement of prompts based on the length and quality of previous responses remains a key practice for identifying the most effective strategies for a given task and LLM 6.

6. Case Studies: Real-World Examples of Smarter Prompting for Output Reduction

Real-world applications have demonstrated the effectiveness of smarter prompting in reducing output tokens without compromising the quality of LLM responses. One example involves optimizing chatbot interactions through concise, template-based prompts and focused contextual retrieval, which reportedly led to over a 30% reduction in token usage 6. Another common scenario involves simplifying verbose prompts by removing unnecessary words and phrases while retaining the core intent. For instance, changing «Please provide a detailed analysis of the company’s financial performance, including all relevant metrics and a discussion of future trends» to the more direct «Analyze the company’s financial performance» can significantly reduce token count without sacrificing the essential information 14. In content generation tasks, specifying the desired output length explicitly in the prompt, such as «Write a 200-word product introduction,» can effectively control the number of generated tokens 30. Breaking down complex tasks into smaller, modular prompts has also proven to be a successful strategy 31. Instead of a single, lengthy prompt asking for multiple outputs, using a sequence of focused prompts can lead to more efficient token usage and improved quality for each individual component 32. For example, in a marketing campaign, separate prompts can be used to generate a slogan, social media posts, and a press release, allowing for more targeted and concise outputs for each. Furthermore, some applications have been re-architected to minimize output by prompting the LLM to return references or pointers to information rather than the full data itself, effectively reducing the volume of generated text 33. These case studies illustrate the practical benefits of applying intelligent prompt engineering techniques to achieve cost-effective and efficient LLM usage.

7. Navigating the Trade-offs: Output Token Reduction Versus Answer Quality

The pursuit of output token reduction necessitates a careful consideration of the inherent trade-offs with answer quality 14. The optimal level of reduction is not a universally applicable target but rather a balance point that depends heavily on the specific requirements of the task and the acceptable level of potential quality degradation 36. Some applications might prioritize significant cost savings and be willing to tolerate a slight decrease in the length or detail of the response, while others might demand the highest possible quality and completeness, even if it entails higher token consumption 37. Techniques like «Concise Chain-of-Thought» (CCoT) represent efforts to specifically address this trade-off in reasoning tasks 40. CCoT aims to reduce the verbosity associated with traditional Chain-of-Thought prompting while preserving its benefits in improving the LLM’s reasoning capabilities. This highlights the ongoing research and development focused on optimizing efficiency without sacrificing performance. A practical approach to navigating this trade-off involves empirically testing different prompt variations with varying levels of conciseness 31. By conducting A/B testing and evaluating the resulting output in terms of both token count and quality (e.g., accuracy, completeness, relevance), developers can identify the point at which further token reduction starts to significantly impact the desired level of answer quality for their specific application. It is crucial to remember that token optimization should be performed without altering the natural meaning or intent of the prompt 14. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary verbosity and redundancy while ensuring that the LLM has sufficient information to generate a high-quality response. Ultimately, effectively managing this trade-off requires a deep understanding of the application’s goals, thorough experimentation, and a data-driven approach to prompt engineering.

8. Identifying Question and Task Types Amenable to Efficient Prompting

Certain types of questions and tasks are inherently more amenable to output token reduction through smarter prompting than others 9. Tasks with well-defined objectives and expected output formats tend to be particularly suitable 15. For example, classification tasks, where the LLM needs to categorize an input into a predefined set of labels, typically require short outputs. Similarly, simple question-answering tasks seeking specific facts often necessitate brief and direct responses 42. Summarization tasks, especially when a target length is specified, are also highly amenable to concise prompting 15. Even for more open-ended tasks like content generation or role-playing, prompting techniques can be used to control output length, although the potential impact on creativity and nuance might require careful consideration 9. Setting word limits, requesting short-form replies, or providing examples of concise writing can help manage the number of generated tokens. Tasks that can be effectively broken down into smaller, sequential steps, such as through Chain-of-Thought or Self-Ask prompting, might also lead to more efficient overall token usage 41. By guiding the LLM through a structured reasoning process, the output for each individual step might be shorter and more focused compared to attempting to solve a complex problem with a single, lengthy prompt and response. Furthermore, for tasks requiring factual accuracy, using lower temperature settings can encourage the LLM to provide more deterministic and potentially less verbose answers 13. Understanding these relationships between task type and the effectiveness of prompt-based token reduction allows developers to strategically apply these techniques where they are most likely to yield significant cost savings without compromising performance.

9. Leveraging Automated Tools and Frameworks for Prompt Optimization

The increasing need for efficient and cost-effective LLM usage has led to the development of various automated tools and frameworks designed to assist in prompt optimization 47. These tools aim to streamline the often iterative process of finding optimal prompts that balance output token usage with answer quality. Automated Prompt Engineering (APE) frameworks employ strategies like generating multiple prompt variations, evaluating their performance across different metrics (including token count and quality), and iteratively refining the prompts based on the results 47. Some approaches leverage machine learning or reinforcement learning techniques to automate this optimization process 47. Frameworks like DSPy and Auto Prompt are specifically designed to automatically generate and refine prompts, often allowing users to set constraints or goals related to token usage or cost 48. Evaluation platforms like Helicone and OpenAI Eval provide tools for systematic prompt evaluation, experimentation, and versioning, which are essential for building automated optimization workflows 54. These platforms allow developers to track the performance of different prompts, including their token consumption and the quality of the generated responses, facilitating data-driven optimization. While general LLM frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex might not directly offer automated prompt optimization for token reduction, they provide the infrastructure for building applications where such optimization pipelines could be implemented 50. They offer tools for managing prompts, interacting with different LLM models, and evaluating their outputs, which can be leveraged to create custom automated optimization solutions. The emergence of these automated tools signifies a growing recognition of the importance of prompt optimization in achieving efficient and high-performing LLM applications.

10. Conclusion and Recommendations: Optimizing LLM Inference Costs Through Intelligent Prompting

The analysis presented in this report underscores the significant impact of output tokens on the overall cost of LLM inference. By employing intelligent prompt engineering techniques, it is indeed possible to reduce the number of output tokens generated by LLMs without compromising the quality of the answers. The key lies in understanding the various cost drivers, carefully selecting and applying appropriate prompting strategies, and iteratively refining these strategies based on empirical evaluation of both token usage and answer quality.

Several actionable recommendations can be derived from this investigation:

  1. Prioritize Clarity and Specificity in Prompt Design: Craft prompts that are direct, unambiguous, and clearly articulate the desired output. Avoid unnecessary jargon or verbose phrasing 14.
  2. Explicitly Define Output Format and Length Constraints: When feasible, specify the desired format (e.g., bullet points, JSON) and length (e.g., word or sentence limits) within the prompt to guide the LLM towards concise responses 15.
  3. Leverage Few-Shot Prompting with Exemplars of Desired Length: Provide a few carefully chosen examples that demonstrate the expected level of conciseness and detail in the response 6.
  4. Iterate and Refine Prompts Based on Token Usage and Quality: Continuously monitor the token count and quality of LLM responses and adjust prompts accordingly to find the optimal balance for each specific task 6.
  5. Consider Breaking Down Complex Tasks into Modular Prompts: For intricate queries, explore the possibility of breaking them into a sequence of smaller, more focused prompts, which can sometimes lead to more efficient token usage and improved quality 31.
  6. Experiment with LLM Inference Parameters: Explore the impact of parameters like max_tokens and temperature on output length and quality, and fine-tune them as needed 10.
  7. Evaluate and Potentially Adopt Automated Prompt Optimization Tools: Investigate the growing ecosystem of automated tools and frameworks that can assist in systematically optimizing prompts for reduced output token usage and maintained answer quality 47.
  8. Conduct Task-Specific Optimization: Recognize that the optimal prompting strategies and the acceptable level of token reduction might vary depending on the specific question or task being performed 22.

By diligently applying these recommendations, technical leaders and practitioners can effectively manage the costs associated with LLM inference by intelligently reducing output token generation while ensuring that the LLM continues to provide high-quality, accurate, and complete answers. The ongoing advancements in prompt engineering and automated optimization tools offer promising avenues for achieving a more efficient and sustainable utilization of large language models.

Table 1: LLM Pricing Comparison (Illustrative)

ProviderModelInput Cost per 1k TokensOutput Cost per 1k Tokens
OpenAIGPT-4$0.03$0.06
OpenAIGPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0015$0.002
AnthropicClaude 3 Opus$0.015$0.075
Alibaba CloudQwen-Max$0.0016$0.0064
GoogleGemini 1.5 Pro$0.0012$0.005

Table 2: Prompt Engineering Techniques for Output Token Reduction

TechniqueDescriptionExample
Concise InstructionsUsing clear, direct language without unnecessary details.Instead of: «Could you please tell me about…», use: «Explain…»
Specify Output FormatRequesting output in a structured format like bullet points or JSON.«List the main causes of climate change in bullet points.»
Set Length ConstraintsExplicitly stating the desired length (e.g., word count, sentence count).«Summarize the article in under 100 words.»
Efficient Use of ExamplesProviding a few well-chosen examples demonstrating desired conciseness.(Show an example of a short, effective answer) «Now answer the following question similarly…»
Use Abbreviations/AcronymsEmploying widely accepted abbreviations to save tokens.Use «NASA» instead of «National Aeronautics and Space Administration.»
Remove Redundant InformationEliminating duplicated or unnecessary words and phrases.Instead of: «the current day’s weather forecast,» use: «today’s weather forecast.»
Ask for Structured OutputRequesting the output in a specific structure.«Provide the answer in JSON format with keys ‘summary’ and ‘key_points’.»
Use Stop Sequences/Max TokensUtilizing API parameters to limit the length of the generated response.Setting max_tokens to 150.

Table 3: Trade-offs Between Output Token Reduction and Answer Quality

ScenarioImpact on Token CountImpact on Answer QualityMitigation Strategy
Overly Concise PromptLowMay lack crucial context, leading to inaccuracy/incompletenessGradually increase prompt length and detail until desired quality is achieved.
Optimal PromptModerateBalances conciseness with sufficient context and detail.Aim for this balance through iterative refinement and testing.
Overly Verbose PromptHighMay contain redundant information, increasing cost.Identify and remove unnecessary words, phrases, and details while ensuring core meaning is preserved.
Aggressive CompressionVery LowRisk of losing nuance and important information.Set a compression threshold and evaluate output quality at each stage; consider hybrid compression methods.
Arbitrary Low BudgetUnpredictableMay lead to longer outputs and lower quality («Token Elasticity»).Experiment to find the smallest token budget that achieves both correct answer and lowest actual token cost.

Works cited

  1. Effects of Prompt Length on Domain-specific Tasks for Large Language Models – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.14255
  2. Mastering LLM Inference: Cost-Efficiency and Performance | by Victor Holmin – Medium, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@victorholmin/mastering-llm-inference-cost-efficiency-and-performance-7292ba759dc3
  3. Understanding the cost of Large Language Models (LLMs) – TensorOps, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.tensorops.ai/post/understanding-the-cost-of-large-language-models-llms
  4. LLM Large Language Model Cost Analysis | by La Javaness R&D – Medium, accessed March 22, 2025, https://lajavaness.medium.com/llm-large-language-model-cost-analysis-d5022bb43e9e
  5. Welcome to LLMflation – LLM inference cost is going down fast ️ | Andreessen Horowitz, accessed March 22, 2025, https://a16z.com/llmflation-llm-inference-cost/
  6. Prompt Optimization, Reduce LLM Costs and Latency | by Bijit …, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@bijit211987/prompt-optimization-reduce-llm-costs-and-latency-a4c4ad52fb59
  7. Breaking Down the Cost of Large Language Models | JFrog ML – Qwak, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.qwak.com/post/llm-cost
  8. billing for model inference – Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/billing-for-model-studio
  9. Responses are too long. How to interrupt the LLM correctly? : r/SillyTavernAI – Reddit, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SillyTavernAI/comments/1aytzoi/responses_are_too_long_how_to_interrupt_the_llm/
  10. Using Prompt Engineering to improve LLM Results | by Zul Ahmed – Medium, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@zahmed333/using-prompt-engineering-to-improve-llm-results-278a3e9357dc
  11. LLM Settings – Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/introduction/settings
  12. Top 6 Strategies to Optimize Token Costs for ChatGPT and LLM APIs – TypingMind Blog, accessed March 22, 2025, https://blog.typingmind.com/optimize-token-costs-for-chatgpt-and-llm-api/
  13. Understanding the Anatomies of LLM Prompts: How To Structure Your Prompts To Get Better LLM Responses – Codesmith, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.codesmith.io/blog/understanding-the-anatomies-of-llm-prompts
  14. Token optimization: The backbone of effective prompt engineering – IBM Developer, accessed March 22, 2025, https://developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-token-optimization-backbone-of-effective-prompt-engineering/
  15. Best Prompt Techniques for Best LLM Responses | by Jules S. Damji | The Modern Scientist, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/the-modern-scientist/best-prompt-techniques-for-best-llm-responses-24d2ff4f6bca
  16. LLM Prompting: How to Prompt LLMs for Best Results – Multimodal, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.multimodal.dev/post/llm-prompting
  17. Optimizing Prompts – Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/guides/optimizing-prompts
  18. How to Create Efficient Prompts for LLMs – Nearform, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.nearform.com/digital-community/how-to-create-efficient-prompts-for-llms/
  19. A Guide to Crafting Effective Prompts – Cohere Documentation, accessed March 22, 2025, https://docs.cohere.com/v2/docs/crafting-effective-prompts
  20. Exploring prompt engineering techniques for effective AI outputs – Portkey, accessed March 22, 2025, https://portkey.ai/blog/prompt-engineering-techniques
  21. Prompt Compression: A Guide With Python Examples – DataCamp, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/prompt-compression
  22. Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.18547v4
  23. Prompt Compression in Large Language Models (LLMs): Making Every Token Count | by Sahin Ahmed, Data Scientist | Feb, 2025 | Medium, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@sahin.samia/prompt-compression-in-large-language-models-llms-making-every-token-count-078a2d1c7e03
  24. How does prompt length impact the output of an LLM? – Infermatic.ai, accessed March 22, 2025, https://infermatic.ai/ask/?question=How%20does%20prompt%20length%20impact%20the%20output%20of%20an%20LLM?
  25. The Impact of Prompt Length on LLM Performance: A Data-Driven Study – Media & Technology Group, LLC, accessed March 22, 2025, https://mediatech.group/prompt-engineering/the-impact-of-prompt-length-on-llm-performance-a-data-driven-study/
  26. Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models – ACL Anthology, accessed March 22, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.818.pdf
  27. How does the length of retrieved context fed into the prompt affect the LLM’s performance and the risk of it ignoring some parts of the context? – Milvus, accessed March 22, 2025, https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/how-does-the-length-of-retrieved-context-fed-into-the-prompt-affect-the-llms-performance-and-the-risk-of-it-ignoring-some-parts-of-the-context
  28. Ensuring Consistent LLM Outputs Using Structured Prompts – Ubiai, accessed March 22, 2025, https://ubiai.tools/ensuring-consistent-llm-outputs-using-structured-prompts-2/
  29. The Power of Concise Prompts in Large Language Models, accessed March 22, 2025, https://promptengineering.org/the-power-of-concise-prompts-in-large-language-models/
  30. 5 Powerful Techniques to Slash Your LLM Costs by Up to 90% – Helicone, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.helicone.ai/blog/slash-llm-cost
  31. How to Reduce LLM Costs: Effective Strategies – PromptLayer, accessed March 22, 2025, https://blog.promptlayer.com/how-to-reduce-llm-costs/
  32. Mastering LLM Prompting: Insights from Two Years of Experience with Large Language Models – Yabble, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.yabble.com/blog/mastering-llm-prompting-insights-from-two-years-of-experience-with-large-language-models
  33. How I Reduced Our LLM Costs by Over 85% : r/ArtificialInteligence – Reddit, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1b92hlk/how_i_reduced_our_llm_costs_by_over_85/
  34. Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.18547v3
  35. RouteLLM: Optimizing the Cost-Quality Trade-Off in Large Language Model Deployment, accessed March 22, 2025, https://vivekpandit.medium.com/routellm-optimizing-the-cost-quality-trade-off-in-large-language-model-deployment-c48b7abb2cfa
  36. Comparing LLMs for optimizing cost and response quality – DEV Community, accessed March 22, 2025, https://dev.to/ibmdeveloper/comparing-llms-for-optimizing-cost-and-response-quality-2lej
  37. Towards Optimizing the Costs of LLM Usage – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2402.01742v1
  38. Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.18547v1
  39. Savings in Your AI Prompts: How We Reduced Token Usage by Up to 10% – Requesty, accessed March 22, 2025, https://requesty.ai/blog/savings-in-your-ai-prompts-how-we-reduced-token-usage-by-up-to-10
  40. Token Reduction – Aussie AI, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.aussieai.com/research/token-reduction
  41. Self-Ask Prompting: Improving LLM Reasoning with Step-by-Step Question Breakdown – Learn Prompting, accessed March 22, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/advanced/few_shot/self_ask
  42. Asking better questions: the art of LLM prompting – Version 1, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.version1.com/blog/asking-better-questions-the-art-of-llm-prompting/
  43. Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answers – arXiv, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.11508
  44. How to Craft Prompts for Different Large Language Models Tasks – phData, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.phdata.io/blog/how-to-craft-prompts-for-different-large-language-models-tasks/
  45. 26 principles to improve the quality of LLM responses by 50% : r/ChatGPTPro – Reddit, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/comments/18xxyr8/26_principles_to_improve_the_quality_of_llm/
  46. Prompt Engineering Techniques: Top 5 for 2025 – K2view, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.k2view.com/blog/prompt-engineering-techniques/
  47. Automating Prompt Engineering for LLM Workloads | by Bijit Ghosh | Medium, accessed March 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@bijit211987/automating-prompt-engineering-for-llm-workloads-f4ea6295aa6b
  48. Prompt Optimization Techniques – Arize AI, accessed March 22, 2025, https://arize.com/blog/prompt-optimization-few-shot-prompting/
  49. Eladlev/AutoPrompt: A framework for prompt tuning using Intent-based Prompt Calibration, accessed March 22, 2025, https://github.com/Eladlev/AutoPrompt
  50. LLM prompt optimization : r/LangChain – Reddit, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LangChain/comments/1cxcln7/llm_prompt_optimization/
  51. 5 Ways to Optimize LLM Prompts for Production Environments – Latitude.so, accessed March 22, 2025, https://latitude.so/blog/5-ways-to-optimize-llm-prompts-for-production-environments/
  52. The Top 5 LLM Frameworks in 2025 – Skillcrush, accessed March 22, 2025, https://skillcrush.com/blog/best-llm-frameworks/
  53. LLM Agents – Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/research/llm-agents
  54. Top Prompt Evaluation Frameworks in 2025: Helicone, OpenAI Eval, and More, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.helicone.ai/blog/prompt-evaluation-frameworks
  55. 5 Approaches to Solve LLM Token Limits – Deepchecks, accessed March 22, 2025, https://www.deepchecks.com/5-approaches-to-solve-llm-token-limits/